Happy Friday! Somehow, it’s already the end of August. The days are still warm, but we are looking forward to some fall weather and football games. Make sure to enjoy the last days of summer before Labor Day arrives. We hope you have a great weekend.
This week in federal government contracting included stories related to the monumental SBA size standard proposal (that we discussed here) and GSA highlighting procurement fraud.
Continue readingAffiliation is a notorious term in the world of federal procurement, especially when it comes to SBA size determinations. And affiliation analyses can be even more confusing when it comes to joint ventures. A recent SBA OHA decision, however, answered some common questions regarding joint ventures and affiliation. It also reiterated some fundamental standards of a size determination and OHA size determination appeal.
Continue readingNavigating the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) regulations can sometimes feel like navigating through a room filled with laser tripwires. One wrong decision or misstep could result in the company’s disqualification. A company might make a decision relying on its understanding of one SBA regulation, unaware of the application of an entirely different SBA regulation. While a miscalculation in complying with the regulations doesn’t trigger the same disasters shown in an action-packed spy movie, the effects can still be costly.
In Primary Health Care, LLC d/b/a Anglin Distinctive Health Care JV, LLC, SBA No. SIZ-6370 (2025), a joint venture’s misapplication of SBA’s timing rules for size determination standards resulted in the company’s ineligibility for award.
Continue readingAs Federated Maritime, LLC, SBA SIZ-6360, 2025 demonstrates, an agency’s review of a size protest must be more than just a surface-level review and a rubber stamp. This size appeal started with a disappointed bidder (here, the Appellant) that questioned the relationship between Schuyler Line Navigation Company, LLC (or Awardee), a company that won two cargo charter contracts, and its alleged affiliates. The contracts were 100% set-aside for small businesses under NAICS Code 483111 – Deep Sea Freight Transportation.
Continue readingJoint ventures created between a small business protégé and a large mentor are without a doubt a very alluring and popular aspect of the SBA’s Mentor-Protégé Program. It provides an incentive to potential mentors to share their connections, resources, experience, and industry knowledge with small businesses, many of whom are not only small, but participants in one of the various SBA programs such as the 8(a) Program and Woman-Owned Small Business Program, to name a couple. But, as appealing as mentor protégé joint ventures are, a recent decision demonstrates (yet again) there are a number of joint venture requirements that must be met if you want to experience their benefits. And failure to do so can result in some undesirable consequences.
Continue readingFor small business set-aside contracts, including socioeconomic set-asides like the 8(a) program, a federal contractor must meet the SBA’s size standards. These size standards vary by industry and solicitation and are based on either average annual receipts or the number of employees. But size alone doesn’t tell the whole story. Many small businesses are surprised to learn that they could be deemed affiliated with other entities based on factors such as ownership, management, family relationships, or subcontracting. If the SBA finds companies affiliated, it will combine the receipts or employees of the various companies, which can disqualify a company from small business programs.
In this training, you will learn:
Whether you’re new to federal contracting or looking to grow your small business through set-aside opportunities or partnering with small businesses, this session will give you the tools to know about small business size standards, affiliation, and positioning your company to play by these rules.
Hope you can join us! Register here.
Joint ventures pursuing a contract under any of the SBA’s socioeconomic programs (Woman-Owned Small Business Program, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Program, 8(a) Program, and HUBZone) all have requirements beyond the general requirements that a non-joint venture prime contractor must meet to be eligible for those types of set-asides. The joint venture must be considered small, which may take into account the size of both venturers, and the joint venture agreement itself must contain specific information. But what happens when the regulatory text isn’t exactly clear on how those two requirements fit together? And how are unsuccessful offerors, contracting officers, and the SBA itself supposed to challenge the status of those joint ventures if the regulatory text doesn’t explicitly provide for the means to do so? Read our analysis of the decision in Chenega Base and Logistics Services, LLC to find out!
Continue reading