Tag Archives: size protests

5 Things You Should Know: The Nonmanufacturer Rule

Posted on by

Editor’s note: For more information, check out our updated post on the nonmanufacturer rule.

To qualify as a small business under most set-aside or sole source contracts seeking manufactured products or supplies, SBA’s regulations require an offeror to be the item’s manufacturer or, alternatively, comply with the nonmanufacturer rule.

In a prior post, we discussed 5 Things You Should Know about being the item’s manufacturer; in this post, we’ll discuss qualifying under the nonmanufacturer rule.

Read more

OHA Rules that Size Protest Wasn’t Five Years Too Late

Posted on by

As we’ve discussed in previous posts, if you want to initiate a size protest, you generally must do so within 5 business days after the contracting officer notifies you of the prospective awardee’s identity.

But what happens if, after learning that you did not receive the award, the agency does something that suggests its award decision wasn’t final–e.g., reopens discussions with offerors and seeks revised proposals? Would your size protest still be late if didn’t file within the 5-day time frame?

Take a guess. And keep reading to find out the answer!

Continue reading →

Update: SBA Says 5-Year Receipts Calculation Period Not Yet Effective

Posted on by

On December 17, 2018, the Small Business Runway Extension Act became law. As we’ve previously written, this Act had a single purpose: to extend the measurement period of the SBA’s calculation of average annual receipts, from three years to five.

We opined that the Act became effective with the stroke of the President’s pen. Just a few days ago, however, the SBA disagreed—according to the SBA, the 5-year calculation period will not become effective until its regulations are revised.

Continue reading →

Offeror Unintentionally Files Size Protest, Confuses SBA OHA

Posted on by

A communication to a contracting officer taking issue with an awardee’s size can be treated as a size protest–even if the offeror making the communication didn’t intend to file a size protest.

That’s what happened in Sea Box, Inc., SBA No. SIZ-5846 (Aug. 7, 2017), when an offeror accidentally initiated a size protest after losing an award. Continue reading →

Kingdomware Doesn’t Affect SBA Size Protest Timeliness, Says SBA OHA

Posted on by

The Supreme Court’s now-famous Kingdomware decision doesn’t affect the timeliness of SBA size protests of GSA Schedule orders.

In a recent decision, the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals rejected the notion–based in part on Kingdomware–that an GSA Schedule order is a “contract” for purposes of the SBA’s size protest timeliness rules.  Instead, OHA held, the SBA’s existing rules clearly distinguish between contracts and orders, and often effectively do not permit size protests of individual orders.

Continue reading →

Ostensible Subcontractor Rule: Lessons Learned From SBA OHA

Posted on by

Avoiding affiliation under the SBA’s ostensible subcontractor rule can be difficult, especially since the ostensible subcontractor rule itself, 13 C.F.R. § 121.103(h)(4), does not provide many examples of the factors that may cause ostensible subcontractor affiliation.

A recent decision of the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, Size Appeal of InGenesis, Inc., SBA No. SIZ-5436 (2013), demonstrates that even when a proposed subcontractor will play a major role in the procurement, ostensible subcontractor affiliation may be avoided if the parties carefully structure their relationship.

Continue reading →

Technically Unacceptable? No SBA Size Protest for You!

Posted on by

Remember the famous “Soup Nazi” episode of Seinfeld?  The mustachioed title character, brilliantly played by Larry Thomas, will forever be known for barking, “no soup for you!” to anyone who dared break his many rules.  In the SBA size protest arena, as in the Soup Nazia’s restaurant, technical rules abound.  For instance, if your proposal was technically unacceptable, “no SBA size protest for you!”

Continue reading →