Category Archives: 8(a) Program

Posts dealing with the 8(a) business development program, including 8(a) admissions and eligiblity, requests for reconsideration, ongoing eligibility and compliance, and related matters.

8(a) Company Misses Key Personnel Requirements–But Wins Contract Anyway

Posted on by

An 8(a) company failed to satisfy a solicitation’s experience and key personnel requirements, but the 8(a) company walked away with a $23.9 million contract anyway–thanks to the SBA.

The GAO’s bid protest decision in Coastal Environmental Group, Inc., B-407563, B-407563.3, B-407563.4 (Jan. 14, 2013) demonstrates the power of the SBA under its certificate of competency program to second-guess procuring agencies’ determinations with respect to corporate experience, the resumes of key personnel, and other responsibility matters.

Continue reading →

Unpaid SBA Loan Leads to 8(a) Program Termination

Posted on by

A construction company with cash flow problems did not make payments on its SBA loan–and was terminated from the 8(a) program as a result.

The decision of the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals in C.J. Hearne Construction Co., SBA No. BDP-449 (2012) is an important reminder that unpaid debts to Uncle Sam can be the kiss of death for 8(a) program participation.

Continue reading →

Guest Perspective: Section 811 Stifles Native American Economic Growth

Posted on by

By Kevin J. Allis

While an eleventh hour agreement avoided the “fiscal cliff,” it did not fully resolve potential spending cuts.  The agreement delayed the sequester, but its impacts are still being felt by contractors, particularly by small businesses.  These entities are at the end of the planning process, and delaying a resolution only prolongs uncertainty.

For Native contractors, there is little to be happy about, and much that raises significant concerns.  The consequences of the uncertainty in the federal contracting environment caused by the still looming possibility of sequestration, coupled with the enormously harmful effects of Section 811 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2010 (“NDAA”), are painting a potentially very dreary picture for these companies and the communities they serve.

Continue reading →

8(a) Fraud: Proposal Claimed Past Performance Of Fake NASA Contract

Posted on by

A proposal submitted on behalf of an 8(a) company claimed that the company had performed a $3 million NASA contract even though no such contract existed, according to a recent report issued by the SBA Office of Inspector General.  As alleged in the SBA OIG report, the same honesty-challenged 8(a) company claimed to have 33 employees, even though it never had more than two.

Perhaps it is little wonder that the company in question is alleged to have passed through nearly 100% of its work on several 8(a) set-asides to its non-8(a) subcontractor.

Continue reading →

SBA 8(a) Termination Appeals: The Importance of Technicalities

Posted on by

When it comes to SBA 8(a) termination appeals, failing to follow technical filing requirements can be fatal, as one contractor recently learned the hard way.

In James Kelly Construction Co., SBA No. BDPT-459 (2012), the SBA terminated James Kelly Construction Company from the 8(a) program, alleging that the company’s owner owed outstanding taxes.  The company filed a SBA 8(a) termination appeal with the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, arguing that the owner did not, in fact, owe taxes.

Unfortunately, the company–which prepared and filed its appeal without a lawyer–failed to include with its appeal a copy of the SBA’s termination determination and the date the determination was received.  Because both of these items are required by regulation, SBA OHA dismissed the company’s SBA 8(a) termination appeal, and subsequently denied the company’s request that SBA OHA reconsider its dismissal.

SBA OHA appeals, including 8(a) termination appeals, come with a variety of technical requirements.  As the James Kelly Construction Co. case demonstrates, meeting those technical requirements is imperative, or the appeal could be lost before SBA OHA ever reaches the merits of the matter.

No SBA Prior Approval of Teaming Agreement Leads to 8(a) Program Termination

Posted on by

In a case that ought to make 8(a) participants sit up and take notice, an 8(a) company was terminated from the 8(a) program for failing to obtain the SBA’s prior approval of its teaming agreement for an 8(a) contract–and the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals upheld the termination.

Continue reading →

SBA OIG Issues Report Questioning 8(a) Non-Manufacturer Rule Waiver

Posted on by

The SBA’s waiver of the non-manufacturer rule in connection with an 8(a) sole source contract resulted in a “pass through” award to a large business, according to a report by the SBA Office of Inspector General.  As a result, the 8(a) contractor in question received only $153,000 for “minimal” oversight, while the remainder of the $7.78 million 8(a) set-aside contract went to large companies.

The SBA OIG was quick to point out that the arrangement was legal, but questioned whether the pass-through provided appropriate developmental opportunities to the 8(a) contractor–as well as whether taxpayers are well-served by such large percentages of “small business” contracting dollars flowing to large companies.

Continue reading →