SBA has issued its regulatory agenda for what rules it plans to roll out later this year. Here is a rundown of the key rules.Continue reading
If you’re a regular SmallGovCon reader (and we hope you are!), you probably are familiar with the Small Business Runway Extension Act. Under the Runway Extension Act, Congress lengthened the period used to determine small business status under receipts-based size standards, from three to five years. Congress’s laudable goal was to allow businesses to “stay small” longer, but the Runway Extension Act can backfire when a business has been shrinking instead of growing.
Now, Congress has done it again. In the Conference Report to the 2021 NDAA, Congress has extended the period used to measure employee-based size standards, from 12 to 24 months–and whether this is good news may depend on if a business has been growing or shrinking.Continue reading
In what might be a classic “now you tell me” scenario, the SBA issued a new rule May 21 saying that if an applicant failed to count the employees of its foreign affiliates when it was determining its eligibility, the SBA will not hold that against the applicant so long as the application was submitted before the SBA clarified that requirement.
The problem with that, however, is that because the safe harbor ended May 18, it’s highly likely that a lot of those businesses already gave their PPP loan back. They’d be forgiven for thinking they had to, as earlier this month Sen. Marco Rubio was indicating that Congress would investigate companies who took PPP funds for which they weren’t eligible.Continue reading
The SBA has rejected several recommendations for major changes in how the SBA calculates small business size status.
In commentary published in the Federal Register last week, the SBA rejected (among other things) recommendations that it use average employee count to evaluate the sizes of construction firms and that other firms’ sizes be measured by profits or net worth instead of average annual receipts.
The SBA has issued a final rule eliminating the unusual megawatt hours size standard applicable to six NAICS codes in NAICS Sector 22. The SBA’s revision replaces the megawatt hours size standard with a 500-employee size standard, and eliminates the requirement that a firm must be “primarily engaged” in the generation, transmission or distribution of energy for sale.
Although the megawatt hours size standard may have made sense when it was adopted in the 1970s, the SBA appropriately recognized that the market has changed. Perhaps most important, the “primarily engaged” component of the megawatt hours size standard unfairly excluded many companies from competing as “small” in NAICS Sector 22.
Back in my undergraduate days at Duke, I attended almost all of the home basketball games. Occasionally, sometime in the second half, with the Blue Devils up 20 points or more, an opposing player would execute an impressive dunk, and proceed to do a little celebration. I, along with my fellow Cameron Crazies, would immediately begin chanting, “scoreboard, scoreboard,” while pointing at the device in question. Our message was, “that’s nice, but it just doesn’t matter.” (Actually, we Crazies sometimes chanted “just doesn’t matter,” too).
“That’s nice, but it just doesn’t matter” is what the SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals had to say in a recent size appeal decision involving the question of whether employees who are sick, on vacation, or even comatose count toward a company’s employee-based SBA size standard. SBA OHA’s answer: if they’re on the payroll, they count. Period.