SBA’s recently proposed rule seeks to officially broaden the reach of its “Rule of Two”–a government contracting requirement fundamental to supporting our nation’s small business infrastructure, policies, and goals. I emphasize “officially” because, even though this is technically a proposed change to SBA’s rules, it is really more of a “regulatory implementation” of judicial law than anything (don’t worry, we will go into more detail on this point later). Specially, SBA’s proposed rule would require the Rule of Two’s application to task orders and delivery orders under most standard multiple award contracts (MAC). This Part I blog will briefly explain what the Rule of Two is and detail SBA’s proposed update to it. But keep your eyes out for the soon-to-follow Part II blog on this topic. There, we will dig in deeper to the relevant history of (including the court case linked above), the sources and policies behind, and the potential implications for SBA’s proposed Rule of Two update.
Continue readingCategory Archives: Statutes and Regulations
Dialing Down: SAM Registration Not Constantly Required
As we’ve written about on the blog, protests have been decided because the offeror was not registered in SAM for the entirety of the proposal review process period. For instance, in this post, we discussed a GAO decision where GAO held that the FAR requires offerors to maintain SAM registration throughout the evaluation period, meaning from proposal submission to award of the contract. A COFC case came to the same conclusion. Well, the federal government didn’t like the result and has published an interim rule to remedy it.
In a recent interim rule effective November 12, 2024, the FAR is being updated to clarify that “the offeror must be registered at time of offer submission and at time of contract award, but would not be required to be registered at every moment in between those two points.”
Continue readingAre Mentor-Protégé Joint Ventures Just Too Successful, Asks SBA
SBA recently issued a proposed rule purportedly concerning the HUBZone Program and its regulations–but actually, covering a bevy of other discussions and proposed changes relating to size, SBA’s other small business socioeconomic programs, and even teaming. Specifically, regarding teaming, SBA revealed that it has apparently decided to take a deeper look into the immense success of mentor-protégé joint venture teaming. It is also requesting comments on this concern, as well as potential policy changes for joint venturing in SBA programs, more generally.
Continue readingBack to Basics: Small Business Sole Source Awards
One of the perks of being certified in any of the SBA’s small business socioeconomic contracting programs is the fact that there is potential for a sole source award. What is a sole source award? Well, it’s a non-competitive award used when there is no expectation that two or more offerors will submit proposals, or using a dollar cap in the 8(a) program. (In this post we’re not talking about other exceptions to competition, such as only one responsible source). We most frequently see them used for contracts made to participants in the 8(a) Small Business Development Program, but the other programs (WOSB, SDVOSB, and HUBZone) have the ability to make sole source awards as well. So, let’s take a look and see what the FAR and SBA rules have to say about sole source awards in each of these programs.
Continue readingSBA Proposed Rule: New Size and Status Recertification Standard
In a proposed rule in August of 2024, SBA has unveiled a brand new regulation related specifically to recertification of size and status. A frequent question of federal contractors is whether they can continue to be small, or maintain a specific socio-economic status (i.e., WOSB, SDVOSB etc.) after a change in ownership or business structure. The SBA’s size and status recertification standards are currently found in multiple places: the size determination timing regulations, each socio-economic status regulation, and of course in case law. But this would presumably create a one stop shop for size recertification questions, while also changing some of the long relied-upon standards.
Continue readingPredictions: Upcoming Rules on Conflicts of Interest
Back in 2023, we wrote about Congress’s late-2022 mandate to update and clarify various rules surrounding organizational conflicts of interest (or OCIs). At that time, Congress, in a short piece of legislation, asked that OCI rules be updated to address a number of areas. In this post, I’ll provide some predictions about how the OCI rules will be updated, as we wait for the new proposed rule to come out. In addition, I’m discussing this topic at the Judicial Conference for the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. Once the proposed rule is released, SmallGovCon will also do a run-through of those changes.
Continue readingSBA Proposed Rule Clarifies Mentor-Protégé Misunderstandings
In August, the Small Business Administration issued a proposed rule that was packed to the brim with changes to many of the SBA’s small business contracting programs. We’ve mentioned a few of the changes in prior blog posts. Gregory Weber, discussed potential changes to the SBA’s 8(a) Business Development Program that may result in more relaxed requirements. While Shane McCall, recently took a deep dive into proposed changes to past performance requirements for joint ventures. Today, we will focus on two additional proposed changes to the SBA’s Small Business Mentor-Protégé Program.
Continue reading