As frequent SmallGovCon readers know, the Small Business Administration’s ostensible subcontractor rule can be tricky to navigate. The rule requires contractors not to rely too heavily on a subcontractor in the performance of a contract set aside under an SBA socioeconomic program, but what constitutes relying too heavily can be confusing for small business contractors. Without a clear measure of how reliant is too reliant, businesses have to worry that they may be denied an award or even worse, lose one in a post-award protest. In a recent decision, Daniels Building Company, Inc. v. United States, 24-1787, 175 Fed. Cl. 767 (2025), the Court of Federal Claims (COFC) provided potentially helpful insight into what SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) and the Court of Federal Claims will consider when determining whether a prime contractor is “unusually reliant” on its subcontractor.
Continue readingCategory Archives: Statutes and Regulations
Switcheroo – FAR Change Allows Agency to Amend Solicitation to Broaden Eligibility for Procurement
This past November, we observed a change in the rules regarding SAM registration requirements for procurements. Prior to this rule change, both GAO and the Court of Federal Claims (COFC) had found that the FAR requires offerors to maintain SAM registration throughout the evaluation period for a procurement. With the rule change, FAR 52.204-7 (the regulation at issue) now only requires that an offeror be registered at the time of offer submission and at the time of contract award. A lapse in SAM registration in between those events, in other words, would not be fatal to an offeror’s proposal. Unfortunately for one company, this resulted in a COFC case that essentially reversed its victory at a prior COFC protest. Today, we’ll look at this second case and what happened.
Continue readingHelp Please: SBA Asking for Input on Mentor-Protege and Joint Venture Issues
SBA has indicated that it will be holding a tribal consultation meeting in June. Among the topics to be discussed will be the 8(a) Program and SBA Mentor-Protege Program and joint ventures. This request is interesting because it reveals a little bit about what the SBA is thinking with regards to the Mentor-Protégé Program and joint venture issues. While it is especially relevant for entity-owned 8(a) Program firms, it is also revealing for other small businesses.
Continue readingBreaking: EO Mandates “FAR 2.0” & Deep Dive Into Federal Procurement Efficiency
Yesterday, the new administration issued a new Executive Order (EO) officially requiring a reformation of the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) and a thorough review of the federal procurement system in general. Along with related EOs, they direct the Office of Federal Public Procurement Policy (OFPP), the FAR Council, and the heads of and “senior acquisition and procurement officials” from our federal agencies to create the “FAR 2.0”–as it has aptly been deemed. And they have 180 days to do it.
Continue readingUpdate: SBA Proposed Rule Would Require “Rule of Two” Application to Multiple Award Contract Task and Delivery Orders (Part II)
In Part I of this two-part blog, we covered an SBA proposed rule that would require agencies to apply the Rule of Two to most standard multiple award contracts (MACs) and task and delivery orders thereunder. In that blog, we covered the Rule of Two generally and the basics of SBA’s proposed changes to it. Well, as promised, this Part II blog is going to dig in a bit deeper to this proposed rule, its driving policies, and its potential impacts. But a whole lot has changed in the federal government contracting landscape (even since Part I of this blog). So, I will also address the elephant in the room (as best I can) by providing information regarding the big questions, “will the proposed rule stand a chance–and will there even still be a Rule of Two–under the new administration?“
Continue readingOHA Says: Show me the Money! (in Ostensible Subcontracting Review)
Size and status protests, which are reviewed by the SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA), are far less common than GAO protests which protest an evaluation aspect of a solicitation or award. But when they are used they can be a powerful tool to keep contracting dollars intended for small businesses to stay with small businesses. In the case of Winergy, LLC, OHA takes a look at an award intended for SDVOSBs, to determine if the awardee is in compliance with the ostensible subcontractor rule or if it is subcontracting out the primary and vital parts of the contract. The lesson? If you want to keep an award, be sure that you, or a similarly situated subcontractor, will be performing the primary and vital parts of the contract and that you can support that assertion with evidence.
Continue readingExecutive Order for Nondisplacement of Federal Workers Rescinded
Indeed, Executive Order (EO) No. 14055, Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts, was only one of many predecessor EOs rescinded by the Trump administration shortly after taking office. But its removal has significant impacts on federal government contracting. As explained in EO No. 14055, its requirements sought to promote skilled worker retention in the federal workforce by placing requirements on contractors (and subcontractors) to provide the service employees from predecessor service contracts an essential right of first refusal of employment in successor or follow-on contracts. But EO No. 14055 has now been officially rescinded as part of the new administration’s stated policy to lift any orders it felt were “replacing hard work, merit, and equality with a divisive and dangerous preferential hierarchy.”
Continue reading