We opined that the Act became effective with the stroke of the President’s pen. Just a few days ago, however, the SBA disagreed—according to the SBA, the 5-year calculation period will not become effective until its regulations are revised.
The Supreme Court’s now-famous Kingdomware decision doesn’t affect the timeliness of SBA size protests of GSA Schedule orders.
In a recent decision, the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals rejected the notion–based in part on Kingdomware–that an GSA Schedule order is a “contract” for purposes of the SBA’s size protest timeliness rules. Instead, OHA held, the SBA’s existing rules clearly distinguish between contracts and orders, and often effectively do not permit size protests of individual orders.
Avoiding affiliation under the SBA’s ostensible subcontractor rule can be difficult, especially since the ostensible subcontractor rule itself, 13 C.F.R. § 121.103(h)(4), does not provide many examples of the factors that may cause ostensible subcontractor affiliation.
A recent decision of the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, Size Appeal of InGenesis, Inc., SBA No. SIZ-5436 (2013), demonstrates that even when a proposed subcontractor will play a major role in the procurement, ostensible subcontractor affiliation may be avoided if the parties carefully structure their relationship.
Remember the famous “Soup Nazi” episode of Seinfeld? The mustachioed title character, brilliantly played by Larry Thomas, will forever be known for barking, “no soup for you!” to anyone who dared break his many rules. In the SBA size protest arena, as in the Soup Nazia’s restaurant, technical rules abound. For instance, if your proposal was technically unacceptable, “no SBA size protest for you!”
Today’s public service announcement comes to us courtesy of the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals. Here it is: asking for and receiving a debriefing does not extend the deadline to file a SBA size protest. Asking for a debriefing may extend the time frame for filing a GAO bid protest but does not extend the five-business-day period for filing a SBA size protest.
Case in point: the decision of SBA OHA in Size Appeal of Garco Construction, Inc., SBA No. SIZ-5308 (2011). In that case, a small business learned of award to a competitor on September 26, but waited until after it received its debriefing on October 21 to file its SBA size protest. The small business argued that its size protest should be considered timely, because it has no knowledge of the grounds of protest until after the debriefing.
Nice try. SBA OHA made short work of this argument, stating “that a protester did not learn of the grounds for its protest until the debriefing is no basis for extending the deadline for filing a protest.” SBA OHA held that the SBA Area Office had properly dismissed the size protest as untimely.
And that concludes today’s public service announcement for small government contractors. As they say on NBC, “The More You Know.”
Can a contractor file an SBA size protest alleging so-called “ostensible subcontractor” affiliation, without knowing the identity of the subcontractor in question? Yes. According to the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, a size protest should not be dismissed as “non-specific” just because it alleges ostensible with an unknown subcontractor–or a “mystery subcontractor,” if one is inclined to be a bit more dramatic.