Tag Archives: SBA size appeals

SBA Affiliation Rules and Unanimity Provisions: Some SBA OHA Guidance

Posted on by

A company’s minority owners often insist that certain  actions be approved unanimously or on a supermajority basis, giving the minority owner the ability to control (or at least veto) those actions.

But small government contractors must tread very carefully when it comes to unanimity or supermajority provisions in their bylaws, operating agreements, or other governing documents.  Although the SBA permits unanimity or supermajority provisions regarding certain “extraordinary” corporate actions, other unanimity or supermajority provisions may result in a finding that the minority owner exercises undue negative control over the company, leading to affiliation problems with other companies controlled by that minority owner.

The decision of the SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals in Size Appeal of DHS Systems, Inc., SBA No. SIZ-5211 (2011) offers some guidance as to which provisions pass muster under the SBA affiliation rules, and which do not.

Continue reading →

Contradictory, Post Hoc Statements Don’t “Fix” Ostensible Subcontractor Rule Problem

Posted on by

When a small government contractor gets its hand caught in the “affiliation” cookie jar, the natural reaction is to scramble to fix the problem, even if it means contradicting the contractor’s own proposal.  But don’t expect post hoc efforts at fixing a problem with the SBA affiliation rules to pan out.  The SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals has held that where a contractor’s after-the-fact statements regarding affiliation contradict its proposal, the language of the proposal governs.

Continue reading →

SBA Size Protests, Timeliness, and After Hours Notifications

Posted on by

An SBA size protest on a negotiated procurement must be submitted within five business days “after the contracting officer has notified the protester of the identity of the prospective awardee.”  But what happens if the contracting officer’s notice arrives after normal working hours?  Does the clock start ticking anyway?

Continue reading →

SBA Affiliation Rules: SBA OHA Says Control is the Key

Posted on by

The SBA affiliation regulation, 13 C.F.R. § 121.103, states that all affiliation is premised on the notion of control.  In other words, two companies are affiliated when the same person or entity controls or has the power to control both.

The size appeal decision of the SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals in Size Appeal of Manroy, USA, LLC, SBA No. SIZ-5244 (2011), explains that when there is no overlapping control, there is no affiliation, even if one or more of the indicia of affiliation described in the regulation might arguably be present.

Continue reading →

SBA OHA: Ostensible Subcontractor Rule Shouldn’t “Close the Door” to New Businesses

Posted on by

A small business’s relative inexperience should not be the primary basis for a determination that the small business is affiliated with its subcontractor under the “ostensible subcontractor” rule, according to the SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals.  SBA OHA’s decision in Size Appeal of Fischer Business Solutions, LLC, SBA No. SIZ-5075 (2009), held that the SBA’s Area Office improperly relied upon a small business’s lack of experience in a particular field to find it affiliated with its subcontractor.

Continue reading →