Tag Archives: SBA size appeals

SBA Affiliation Rules, the Passive Investor, and Weekend at Bernie’s

Posted on by

Remember Weekend at Bernie’s, the 1980s comedy about a couple of young corporate employees who pretend their murdered boss is still alive?  (Random note: did you know that they made a Weekend at Bernie’s 2 in 1993?  Neither did I, until I was writing this post).

What does Bernie have to do with the SBA affiliation rules?  In the movie, Bernie appears to control his company—even though he is not exactly in a position to make executive decisions.  Like Bernie, in the SBA’s eyes, a person can be deemed to control a company, even if he or she does not actually exercise any power.  The decision of the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals in Size Appeal of BR Construction, LLC, SBA No. SIZ-5303 (2011) shows that SBA affiliation problems can arise when bylaws and operating agreements contain certain provisions that the SBA will find give legal control to a minority owner, even if that minority owner, in practice, acts as a passive investor.

Continue reading →

The Non-Manufacturer Rule: More Than Employees

Posted on by

Back in 1976, Boston (the band, not the city), released its self-titled debut album, featuring the hit “More Than a Feeling.”  The tune is still a staple on classic rock stations everywhere.  Before you curse me for getting the song stuck in your head, think of it as an easy way to remember a critical aspect of the “non-manufacturer” size rule.  Simply put, it’s about more than employees.

When an agency issues a solicitation for supplies or products, it’s easy for small businesses to assume that non-manufacturer rule applies, meaning that a business qualifies as “small” so long as it has less than 500 employees.  But, as the SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals has confirmed, a company can only submit a valid offer if your company meets all five “prongs” of the non-manufacturer rule.  Having less than 500 employees only gets you part of the way there.

Continue reading →

SBA OHA Dismisses SBA Size Protest Based on Contractor’s CCR Profile

Posted on by

To survive dismissal, a SBA size protest must be “specific,” that is, it must explain why the protested contractor is not small, and (in many cases), provide third-party evidence supporting the claim.

In Size Appeal of SoftConcept, Inc., SBA No. SIZ-5197 (2011), the SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals held that a SBA size protest was insufficiently specific when the protester alleged that the contract awardee did not list the NAICS code in question, NAICS code 541519, in its Central Contractor Registration profile.

Continue reading →

SBA Affiliation Rules and Unanimity Provisions: Some SBA OHA Guidance

Posted on by

A company’s minority owners often insist that certain  actions be approved unanimously or on a supermajority basis, giving the minority owner the ability to control (or at least veto) those actions.

But small government contractors must tread very carefully when it comes to unanimity or supermajority provisions in their bylaws, operating agreements, or other governing documents.  Although the SBA permits unanimity or supermajority provisions regarding certain “extraordinary” corporate actions, other unanimity or supermajority provisions may result in a finding that the minority owner exercises undue negative control over the company, leading to affiliation problems with other companies controlled by that minority owner.

The decision of the SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals in Size Appeal of DHS Systems, Inc., SBA No. SIZ-5211 (2011) offers some guidance as to which provisions pass muster under the SBA affiliation rules, and which do not.

Continue reading →

Contradictory, Post Hoc Statements Don’t “Fix” Ostensible Subcontractor Rule Problem

Posted on by

When a small government contractor gets its hand caught in the “affiliation” cookie jar, the natural reaction is to scramble to fix the problem, even if it means contradicting the contractor’s own proposal.  But don’t expect post hoc efforts at fixing a problem with the SBA affiliation rules to pan out.  The SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals has held that where a contractor’s after-the-fact statements regarding affiliation contradict its proposal, the language of the proposal governs.

Continue reading →

SBA Size Protests, Timeliness, and After Hours Notifications

Posted on by

An SBA size protest on a negotiated procurement must be submitted within five business days “after the contracting officer has notified the protester of the identity of the prospective awardee.”  But what happens if the contracting officer’s notice arrives after normal working hours?  Does the clock start ticking anyway?

Continue reading →

SBA Affiliation Rules: SBA OHA Says Control is the Key

Posted on by

The SBA affiliation regulation, 13 C.F.R. § 121.103, states that all affiliation is premised on the notion of control.  In other words, two companies are affiliated when the same person or entity controls or has the power to control both.

The size appeal decision of the SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals in Size Appeal of Manroy, USA, LLC, SBA No. SIZ-5244 (2011), explains that when there is no overlapping control, there is no affiliation, even if one or more of the indicia of affiliation described in the regulation might arguably be present.

Continue reading →