Tag Archives: NAICS codes

SBA Proposes Eliminating Megawatt Hours Size Standard

Posted on by

Most government contractors determine their small business size based on average annual receipts or employee counts.  But for companies working in six NAICS codes in NAICS Sector 22, the firm is considered small if: (1) the firm, including its affiliates, is primarily engaged in the generation, transmission, and/or distribution of electric energy for sale; and (2) its total electric output for the preceding fiscal year did not exceed 4 million megawatt hours.  Today, the SBA proposed eliminating this megawatt hours size standard and replacing it with a 500 employee size standard.

In a proposed rule, the SBA stated that significant industry changes have occurred since the megawatt hour standard was adopted in 1974, that the “primarily engaged” requirement could result in some businesses being unfairly deemed large, and that an employee-based size standard is more in keeping with overall SBA size standard policy.  Accordingly, the SBA proposed changing the size standards for all six affected NAICS codes–221111, 221112, 221113, 221199, 221121, and 221122–from 4 million megawatt hours to 500 employees.

In today’s proposed rule, the SBA also proposed three significant size standard increases.  Under the SBA’s proposal, NAICS code 221310 (Water Supply and Irrigation Systems) would jump from $7 million to $25.5 million, NAICS code 221320 (Sewage Treatment Facilities) would increase from $7 million to $19 million and NAICS code 221330 (Steam and Air-Conditioning Supply) would increase from $12.5 million to $14 million.

Today’s proposed changes are part of the SBA’s ongoing review and overhaul of its size standards.  The SBA is accepting comments on today’s rule by September 17.

SBA Proposal: Allow NAICS Appeals on Unrestricted Procurements

Posted on by

Size always matters–even on unrestricted procurements.   That’s the message coming from SBA in light of a proposed rule making a number of changes to its size regulations, primarily to address small business set-asides within the context of multiple-award award contracts.  Buried in the proposed regulation is an interesting change: the SBA intends to give the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals the right to hear challenges to NAICS code designations, even when a procurement is not set-aside for small businesses.

For many years, SBA OHA has dismissed NAICS appeals on unrestricted procurements, stating, in essence, that there is no purpose in appealing the NAICS code when no set-aside is involved.  Although the SBA’s proposed rule doesn’t go into great detail, it seems to me that size can be advantageous, even on an unrestricted procurement.  For instance, a small business generally is exempt from the subcontracting plan requirement, but an “other than small” business typically must submit a subcontracting plan.  Likewise, a HUBZone-certified company will only qualify for the HUBZone price preference if it qualifies as small for the procurement.

Kudos to SBA for recognizing that size always matters, and proposing to amend the NAICS appeal rules accordingly.  Let’s hope that this proposal sticks in the final regulation.

GAO: Agencies Cannot Ignore SBA OHA’s NAICS Code Designations

Posted on by

My daughter isn’t even eight months old yet, but she has developed a case of selective hearing.  If she’s doing something she shouldn’t (like tugging on the blinds), and I tell her to stop, she often pretends not to hear and keeps right on going.  By the time she’s two, she’ll probably be sticking her fingers in her ears and chanting, “la la la, I can’t hear you,” when she doesn’t want to acknowledge me.

Selective hearing isn’t limited to children.  In one case, the Department of Veterans Affairs ignored the SBA’s designation of a new NAICS code for the solicitation.  But, like my daughter, the VA didn’t get away with it for long.

Continue reading →

NAICS Code Appeals: A Quick Timeliness Reminder

Posted on by

If you Google the simple phrase “10 days,” the top result is the IMDb page for the movie How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days.   I haven’t seen this 2003 Matthew McConaughey/Kate Hudson romantic comedy, and Lord willing, never will (though I recall that my 80-something grandmother thoroughly enjoyed it).

Even though NAICS code appeals didn’t pop up first on the Google rankings, actors with a penchant for the Texas Longhorns aren’t the only thing that can be lost in 10 days.   If you want to file a NAICS code appeal with the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, act quickly.  Under the SBA OHA regulations, NAICS code appeals must be filed and served within 10 days after the issuance of the solicitation.  Any later, and you will lose your right to appeal, as one would-be appellant recently learned.

Continue reading →

Subcontractors, NAICS Codes and Small Business Status: The Prime Decides

Posted on by

George W. Bush famously declared himself to be “the decider.”  Although some comedians had fun with the phrase, it’s hard to argue with Bush’s underlying assessment; as head of the government, the President has a lot of decisions to make.  But when it comes to whether you qualify as “small” for purposes of a federal subcontract, it may surprise you to learn that the government isn’t the decider at all.

For a subcontract, the prime contractor—not the government—decides what NAICS code (and corresponding size standard) applies.  The NAICS code the prime contractor selects for your subcontract need not be the same NAICS code assigned to the prime contract as a whole, and you may have the opportunity to lobby the prime contractor to change the NAICS code to one you believe is better-suited for the procurement–and your small business eligibility.

Continue reading →

SBA OHA, Not GAO, Decides NAICS Code Appeals

Posted on by

Appealing the NAICS code a procuring agency assigns to a set-aside solicitation can be a powerful tool: after all, if the NAICS code and corresponding size standard change, it can dramatically alter the competitive playing field.  But if a company wants to file a  NAICS code appeal, it must file with the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, not the GAO, which lacks jurisdiction to hear challenges to NAICS code designations—something the protester in BlueStar Energy Solutions, B-405690 (Dec. 12, 2011) learned too late.

Continue reading →

SBA OHA Dismisses SBA Size Protest Based on Contractor’s CCR Profile

Posted on by

To survive dismissal, a SBA size protest must be “specific,” that is, it must explain why the protested contractor is not small, and (in many cases), provide third-party evidence supporting the claim.

In Size Appeal of SoftConcept, Inc., SBA No. SIZ-5197 (2011), the SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals held that a SBA size protest was insufficiently specific when the protester alleged that the contract awardee did not list the NAICS code in question, NAICS code 541519, in its Central Contractor Registration profile.

Continue reading →