Tag Archives: GAO bid protests

GAO Bid Protest Jurisdiction And Contract Modifications

Posted on by

The GAO’s bid protest jurisdiction typically does not extend to reviews of contract modifications.

In a recent GAO bid protest decision, Cornische Aviation & Maintenance, LTD, B-405013.4 (Jan. 25, 2013), the GAO held that the protester’s allegations regarding a contract modification were not within the scope of the GAO’s bid protest function.  The Cornische Aviation GAO bid protest decision demonstrates the GAO’s limited ability (or willingness, depending on one’s point of view) to decide bid protests involving contract modifications.

Continue reading →

GAO: Task Order Discussions Must Identify Weaknesses

Posted on by

An agency must identify weaknesses or deficiencies in an offeror’s proposal when the agency conducts discussions as part of a task order competition, according to a recent GAO bid protest decision.

In Mission Essential Personnel, LLC, B-407474, B-407493 (Jan. 7, 2013), the GAO held that a procuring agency erred by failing to inform an offeror of two weaknesses or deficiencies in its proposal.  The GAO concluded that discussions must include this information even when the procurement is a task order competition conducted under FAR part 16.

Continue reading →

GAO Task Order Jurisdiction: “Scope” Exception Is Narrow

Posted on by

As I have previously written, the GAO lacks authority to hear bid protests of task orders valued at less than $10 million, except if the protester can show that the order increases the scope, period, or maximum value of the contract against which the order was issued.

In a recent bid protest decision, the GAO held that the “scope” exception applies only if the task order changes the underlying scope of work–denying the protester’s argument that any task order that is not evaluated in accordance with the contract’s requirements necessarily goes beyond the contract’s scope.

Continue reading →

GAO: Low Price Not Evidence of Technical Unacceptability

Posted on by

An awardee’s low price, by itself, is not evidence that the awardee cannot meet the solicitation’s technical requirements, according to a recent GAO bid protest decision.

In Midwest Tube Fabricators, Inc., B-407166, B-407167 (Nov. 20, 2012), the protester argued that the awardee could not meet the solicitation’s requirements at the awarded price.  The GAO dismissed the protest, holding that the protester’s allegation did not present a valid basis of protest.

Continue reading →

GAO Bid Protests Rise 5% In FY 2012

Posted on by

Contractors filed 2,475 GAO bid protests in Fiscal Year 2012, a five percent increase from the prior year, according to the GAO’s annual bid protest report to Congress.  The GAO’s annual report indicated that “sustain” decisions were up slightly from the prior year, while the overall “effectiveness rate” of protests–a combination of sustain decisions and agency corrective actions–held steady at 42%.

Meanwhile, the VA was the only procuring agency to ignore GAO recommendations–something the VA did repeatedly in the Aldevra line of cases.

Continue reading →

Single Negative Past Performance Reference Sinks Contractor’s Bid

Posted on by

Past performance is a key ingredient in most competitive government procurements.  Even if a contractor’s overall past performance record is excellent, a single blemish can damage the contractor’s chances of award.

In a recent GAO bid protest decision, the agency relied on a single adverse past performance reference to assign the contractor a poor past performance rating–even though the contractor strongly disagreed with the adverse reference.  The GAO held that there was nothing wrong with the agency’s past performance evaluation.

Continue reading →

GAO Has Jurisdiction Over BPA Modification Protests

Posted on by

The GAO has jurisdiction to decide protests challenging modifications to blanket purchase agreements, according to a recent GAO protest decision.  In Crewzers Fire Crew Transport, Inc., B-406601 (July 11, 2012), the GAO rejected a procuring agency’s argument that BPA modifications are a matter of contract administration, and thus outside the GAO’s protest jurisdiction.

Continue reading →