In Part I of this two-part blog, we covered an SBA proposed rule that would require agencies to apply the Rule of Two to most standard multiple award contracts (MACs) and task and delivery orders thereunder. In that blog, we covered the Rule of Two generally and the basics of SBA’s proposed changes to it. Well, as promised, this Part II blog is going to dig in a bit deeper to this proposed rule, its driving policies, and its potential impacts. But a whole lot has changed in the federal government contracting landscape (even since Part I of this blog). So, I will also address the elephant in the room (as best I can) by providing information regarding the big questions, “will the proposed rule stand a chance–and will there even still be a Rule of Two–under the new administration?“
Continue readingTag Archives: delivery orders
Update: SBA Proposed Rule Would Require “Rule of Two” Application to Multiple Award Contract Task and Delivery Orders (Part I)
SBA’s recently proposed rule seeks to officially broaden the reach of its “Rule of Two”–a government contracting requirement fundamental to supporting our nation’s small business infrastructure, policies, and goals. I emphasize “officially” because, even though this is technically a proposed change to SBA’s rules, it is really more of a “regulatory implementation” of judicial law than anything (don’t worry, we will go into more detail on this point later). Specially, SBA’s proposed rule would require the Rule of Two’s application to task orders and delivery orders under most standard multiple award contracts (MAC). This Part I blog will briefly explain what the Rule of Two is and detail SBA’s proposed update to it. But keep your eyes out for the soon-to-follow Part II blog on this topic. There, we will dig in a bit deeper to the Rule of Two, the policies driving it, and the potential implications for SBA’s proposed Rule of Two update.
Continue readingGAO: Small Business Rule of Two Doesn’t Require Set-Aside for Task Order
Generally, the small business Rule of Two requires an agency to set aside contracts for small business, assuming that there are at least two small businesses with competitive prices who will bid on the contract. But does the small business Rule of Two apply to orders under a multiple award contract? In a recent decision, GAO affirmed the answer is no–application of the small business Rule of Two for orders under a multiple-award contract is discretionary.
Continue readingCOFC: No Jurisdiction Over Bundling of Contracts into Task Order
When considering where to file a bid protest, you have options at the agency level, Government Accountability Office, and Court of Federal Claims. But not all options are available for protests of task and delivery order awards. The Court of Federal Claims recently reminded a protester that it lacks jurisdiction over task and delivery orders, even where an agency is proposing to bundle multiple separate contracts into one task order.
Continue readingSBA Proposes to Change When Companies Need to Recertify Size and Status for Orders
SBA recently proposed changes to a number of its small business rules, as we’ve written about in earlier posts. The same proposed rule includes a small but significant change to when a business has to recertify its size and status for orders under multiple award contracts.
Based on the number of times we’ve written about size and status protests for orders under multiple award contracts (see the related content at the bottom of this post for a sampling), this is an area in need of clarity.
Continue readingCost/Price Evaluation To Be Discretionary For Some DoD IDIQs
Under the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act, the DoD has the discretion to forego a price or cost evaluation in connection with the award of certain multiple-award contracts.
The 2017 NDAA includes some important changes that are sure to impact federal procurements. Section 825 of the NDAA, which allows DoD contracting officers to forego price or cost evaluations in certain circumstances, is one of these changes.
GAO’s Jurisdiction Over Most Civilian Task Order Protests Has Expired
The GAO’s jurisdiction to hear most protests in connection with task and delivery order awards under civilian multiple award IDIQs has expired.
In a recent bid protest decision, the GAO confirmed that it no longer has jurisdiction to hear protests in connection with civilian task and delivery order awards valued over $10 million because the underlying statutory authority expired on September 30, 2016.