The GAO has jurisdiction to decide protests challenging modifications to blanket purchase agreements, according to a recent GAO protest decision. In Crewzers Fire Crew Transport, Inc., B-406601 (July 11, 2012), the GAO rejected a procuring agency’s argument that BPA modifications are a matter of contract administration, and thus outside the GAO’s protest jurisdiction.
Category Archives: GAO Bid Protests
GAO bid protest decisions, commentary on GAO bid protest regulations, and related topics.
Small Business Wins SBA OHA Size Appeal–But Contract Not Reinstated
A SBA size protest can be a matter of life and death for a small business, which may find it impossible to effectively compete if it is found “other than small.” If a protested contractor loses a size protest, it is not necessarily the end of the road: it has the option of filing a size appeal with the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals.
Winning a SBA OHA size appeal often results in “small” status once again, but a SBA OHA victory may have its limits. As one contractor recently discovered, if the procuring agency terminates a contract award following an adverse SBA size protest decision, the agency is not required to reinstate the contract if the contractor subsequently prevails in its SBA OHA size appeal.
Contractor Corrects “Weakness”, Loses Contact As A Result
When, in discussions, a procuring agency tells a contractor that an aspect of the contractor’s proposal is a weakness, the natural response is to correct the problem. In one recent GAO bid protest decision, however, correcting a weakness may have cost a contractor a $30 million award.
In EMR, Inc., B-406625 (July 17, 2012), the procuring agency informed the contractor that certain labor rates appeared low in comparison to other offerors’ rates, and labeled the low rates a weakness. In response, the contractor raised the rates in question, thereby increasing its overall price–then narrowly lost out on a low-price, technically acceptable contract.
The GAO’s verdict? The agency did nothing wrong.
8(a) Sole Source Contracts: Little Explanation Necessary
Agencies have broad discretion when it comes to issuing 8(a) sole source contract awards. Although a procuring agency must provide the SBA with some justification as to why it selected a particular 8(a) company for a sole source contract, that justification can be very brief. And, as the GAO held in a recent bid protest decision, an 8(a) sole source contract justification need not explain why the 8(a) awardee was superior to another 8(a) company interested in the same contract.
GAO Sustains An Aldevra Protest (Again)
The original Rocky was popular with audiences and critics alike, rating as the highest-grossing film of 1976 and picking up three Oscars, including Best Picture. But by the time the franchise reached Rocky V in 1990, the ongoing sequels had become something of a joke. In a Washington Post review, critic Desson Howe opened with: “Moments after that brutal bout with Dolph Lundgren in “Rocky IV” — and you did watch “Rocky IV,” didn’t you? — Sly Stallone mistakes his wife for his dead boxing coach. This is not a good sign, even for the Rockster.”
Like the Rocky series, the fight between Aldevra and the VA keeps spawning sequels. For service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses, the good news is that Aldevra has won yet another GAO bid protest, challenging the VA’s refusal to consider a SDVOSB set-aside before procuring equipment from the GSA Schedule. The bad news is that the sequels keep coming, with no sign that the VA will back down.
Agency Awards HUBZone Set-Aside to Federal Prison Industries
When is a HUBZone set-aside not really a HUBZone set-aside? According to one GAO bid protest decision, when Federal Prison Industries (also known as UNICOR) submits an offer.
In Tennier Industries, Inc., B-403946.2 (June 29, 2012), the Defense Logistics Agency set-aside a procurement for HUBZone contractors, but awarded the contract to Federal Prison Industries rather than a HUBZone company. One might think that the GAO would sustain a bid protest. Instead, the GAO held that the award to FPI was A-OK.
Price Realism: GAO Rejects “Incumbent Knows Best” Argument
When an incumbent contractor loses a follow-on contract to a lower-priced competitor, the incumbent sometimes complains that after successfully performing the contract, it “knows what it takes” to get the job done, and that based on its experience, the competitor’s price is unrealistically low.
It is a perfectly logical argument, with one big problem: it can be very difficult to convince the GAO that an incumbent knows better than the procuring agency what constitutes a realistic fixed price for a contract. The difficulty in succeeding with such an “incumbent knows best” price realism protest is demonstrated in a recently released GAO bid protest decision, Resource Ltd., B-406492, B-406492.2 (June 6, 2012).