Compliance with the ostensible subcontractor rule is essential for companies seeking small business and socioeconomic set-asides. Yet many contractors learn the hard way that there is a difference between simply claiming compliance and proving it.

Earlier this year, we blogged on an SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) decision (here) that examined whether a subcontractor was an ostensible subcontractor or not. Ultimately, the awardee failed to sufficiently demonstrate that its subcontractor was not performing the primary and vital parts of the contract.  

In a recent OHA decision, the same parties went head-to-head again for round two, on a different procurement with a different proposal. But this time, one party brought the receipts. In reviewing the proposal, SBA found that the prime contractor had properly outlined its tasks and work in alignment with the solicitation and showed its compliance with the limitations on subcontracting. These two cases work in tandem to help show federal contractors how to demonstrate compliance with the ostensible subcontractor rule.