Author Archives: Steven Koprince

The VA’s SDVOSB Database and GAO Protests: Be Verified, Or Go Home

Posted on by

If a service-disabled veteran-owned small business has been denied verification for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs’ Vendor Information Pages database, it cannot file a bid protest with the GAO challenging the VA’s award decision on a VA SDVOSB set-aside procurement—even if the company has a request for reconsideration pending with the VA’s Center for Veterans Enterprise.

So says the GAO in MICCI Imaging Construction Company, B-405654 (November 28, 2011), a decision in which the GAO held that a company that has been denied verification lacks “standing” to pursue a GAO bid protest of a VA SDVOSB set-aside to a competitor.  Translating the legalese, the GAO’s message to non-verified companies is, “don’t waste our time.”

Continue reading →

SBA Affiliation Rules, the Passive Investor, and Weekend at Bernie’s

Posted on by

Remember Weekend at Bernie’s, the 1980s comedy about a couple of young corporate employees who pretend their murdered boss is still alive?  (Random note: did you know that they made a Weekend at Bernie’s 2 in 1993?  Neither did I, until I was writing this post).

What does Bernie have to do with the SBA affiliation rules?  In the movie, Bernie appears to control his company—even though he is not exactly in a position to make executive decisions.  Like Bernie, in the SBA’s eyes, a person can be deemed to control a company, even if he or she does not actually exercise any power.  The decision of the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals in Size Appeal of BR Construction, LLC, SBA No. SIZ-5303 (2011) shows that SBA affiliation problems can arise when bylaws and operating agreements contain certain provisions that the SBA will find give legal control to a minority owner, even if that minority owner, in practice, acts as a passive investor.

Continue reading →

Subcontractor’s Provision of Bonds OK with GAO—But Watch Out for Affiliation

Posted on by

Small prime contractors often have difficulty securing necessary bid, performance and payment bonds for federal government contracts–especially in the construction industry, where payment and performance bonds are typically required.  Not surprisingly, small primes often turn to their larger subs to secure the necessary bonding.

A small prime’s reliance on its subcontractor for bonding was recently put to the test in a GAO bid protest.  Fortunately for small primes everywhere, in Shaka, Inc., B-405552 (Nov. 14, 2011), the GAO held that the subcontractor’s role in the bond process did not render the bond defective.  But small primes and their large subcontractors shouldn’t pop the champagne for a celebration, because subcontractor bonding assistance can still increase the risk of ostensible subcontractor affiliation.

Continue reading →

SBA OHA OK’s “Mystery Subcontractor” SBA Size Protests

Posted on by

Can a contractor file an SBA size protest alleging so-called “ostensible subcontractor” affiliation, without knowing the identity of the subcontractor in question?  Yes.  According to the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, a size protest should not be dismissed as “non-specific” just because it alleges ostensible with an unknown subcontractor–or a “mystery subcontractor,” if one is inclined to be a bit more dramatic.

Continue reading →

OCIs and Former Government Employees: GAO Finds Agency Properly Excluded Contractor

Posted on by

When it comes to hiring former government employees, criminal law prohibits certain conduct (like attempting to hire a contracting officer who is currently evaluating your proposal).  But just because a hire meets the letter of the law does not mean that it won’t cause an organizational conflict of interest, or OCI.

That’s exactly what happened in the GAO’s decision in TeleCommunication Systems, Inc., B-404496.3 (Oct. 26, 2011)–and it cost a contractor an award.

Continue reading →

GAO: For VA, SDVOSB Set-Asides Trump GSA Schedule Buys

Posted on by

“Veterans First” really means “Veterans First,” even if the VA would prefer to conduct an unrestricted procurement under the General Services Administration’s Federal Supply Schedule rather than conducting market research to see if the procurement can be set-aside for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses.  So said that GAO in an important bid protest decision for SDVO small businesses, Aldevra, B-405271 (Oct. 11, 2011).

In Aldevra, the VA attempted to purchase certain supplies for a VA Medical center through the GSA Schedule on an unrestricted basis.  Aldevra, a SDVOSB, filed a protest with the GAO, arguing that before using the GSA Schedule, the VA should have conducted market research to determine whether two or more offers would be received from eligible SDVOSBs, and if so, should have set-aside the competition for SDVOSBs.

Continue reading →

The Non-Manufacturer Rule: More Than Employees

Posted on by

Back in 1976, Boston (the band, not the city), released its self-titled debut album, featuring the hit “More Than a Feeling.”  The tune is still a staple on classic rock stations everywhere.  Before you curse me for getting the song stuck in your head, think of it as an easy way to remember a critical aspect of the “non-manufacturer” size rule.  Simply put, it’s about more than employees.

When an agency issues a solicitation for supplies or products, it’s easy for small businesses to assume that non-manufacturer rule applies, meaning that a business qualifies as “small” so long as it has less than 500 employees.  But, as the SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals has confirmed, a company can only submit a valid offer if your company meets all five “prongs” of the non-manufacturer rule.  Having less than 500 employees only gets you part of the way there.

Continue reading →